Last
night's count of the electoral votes in the election of the Progressive
Conservative party's new leader shows just how dependent the red tories
are upon the continued support of the conservative half of the PC party,
which backed Mr. Klees and Mr. Flaherty. With a 100 point system that
equally weights ridings, Mr. Tory surpassed the 5028 electoral vote
threshhold by only 362.86 votes. Mr. Flaherty's supporters were only
363.86 electoral votes short of a leadership win.
The
panicky calls for "unity", "loyalty" and "backing the leader" will now
commence at full volume within the PC party. The simple fact, however,
is that the PC Party of Ontario, like its federal counterpart in the
early 90s, has become two parties running under one name. Like a
marriage on the rocks, everyone knows it, though many are afraid to
admit it. The PC party is now a party in which a slender majority of Joe
Clark style conservatives will beg the other half of the party not to
allow, at the provincial level, the political re-alignment that happened
federally. That other half will be doing a lot of soul-searching:
searching desperately for a rationale for continuing a relationship that
has been too strained for too long, and is resulting in
estrangement.
A
political re-alignment at the provincial level is inevitable, however.
Blue tories will now be asked to be loyal to a party that stands for
many of the Liberal policies that blue tories have been fighting so hard
to defeat. Many will see no reason to be loyal to a party that has been
disloyal to them. Blue tories will be called upon for money and time.
Most will not provide either. Blue tories will be told they are an
essential part of the same team. Blue tories will know, however, that
they are only being told that because their numbers are needed to give
the red tories a shot at government.
Those
who backed Mr. Flaherty will not hold their breath in anticipation that
the PC party will now eliminate the funding barriers that deter Ontario
parents from sending their children to independent schools. Those who
backed Mr. Klees know that a John Tory-led PC party will not allow
competition between government health care and a parallel private
system. The private electricity sector will not be inspired to invest in
electricity generation or transmission within Ontario: Hydro One's
assets will continue to deteriorate and to be inadequate for the
transmission of additional power. Drivers will not now expect a PC
government to axe the no fault auto insurance system that lies at the
root of overpriced insurance in Ontario, even though it has been
repealed in more than half of the US states in which it was tried. The
simple fact, recognized by anyone who has been paying attention since
the PC leadership election of 2002, is that a slight majority of red
tories has decided that the Common Sense Revolution was an abberation;
an unusual blip in PC party history. They have decided to fight election
2007 not on the basis of policy differences between the PCs and the
Liberals, but upon the supposed honesty, integrity and ability of the
two parties' leaders. They have decided to run a campaign that places
style over substance, polls over principle.
The
election of John Tory to the leadership of the Ontario Progressive
Conservative Party is the outcome that Freedom Party of Ontario has
anticipated since 2002, when the red tory majority of the PC membership
ejected the common sense agenda of the Mike Harris government, and
sidelined his supporters within the party. It is, in fact, the outcome
for which Freedom Party has been preparing since 2002.
I
will not feign indifference. I am quite delighted with the PC leadership
outcome because it will continue the advancement, at the provincial
level, of the political re-alignment that happened federally. The
selection of John Tory to lead the PC party leaves Freedom Party the
only party in Ontario that continues to advocate common sense,
economically sound solutions to the problems facing health care,
education, and electricity in Ontario.
With
three parties (four, if you include the Greens) fighting over -
splitting, if you will - the pro-socialist/pro-central-planning vote,
being Ontario's only capitalist party puts Freedom Party in an enviable
position. A slender but powerful majority of the PC party wants a party
that manages the status quo better. Freedom Party wants to
exchange the status quo for something better. We want health
care, education, and electricity that is improved by sound economics,
rather than a mediocre, do-nothing political course.
In
the 36 months ahead, Freedom Party and I will be working very hard to
ensure that Ontario has an alternative to poll driven,
politically-motivated, government. It will require a re-assembly of
those who put substance before style; those who seek success rather than
avoid failure; those who put doing what is right for Ontario's economy
first, and put political expediency last. It
will involve the efforts of those who know that one wins with
conviction, and that one must lead with integrity. It will
require courage on the part of every person who has ever advocated
government reform, and it will require an admission that the right loses
in Ontario only when it surrenders.
To
those in Ontario who are the hope for a better Ontario, I would add only
this: be loyal only to what you know is right. Do not choose to
surrender.