Freedom Flyer July 1992 Cover

Freedom Flyer 21

the official newsletter of the
Freedom Party of Ontario

July 1992




Article electronically reproduced from:
June 10, 1992


Education

Parents question value of whole language teaching

Whole language teaching was a hot topic at the London board of education Tuesday night. By the end of the meeting, a consensus seemed near: schools must do a better job of determining if it's working for children. By KELLEY TEAHEN
The London Free Press

Jois and glad to and net clows and patrin and Good colrs to and big sombrero and net wips.

A child without diagnosed learning problems wrote that sentence in Grade 3, says parent Bonnie Cumming.

The boy's next report card stated it is "easy to read his approximated spellings,"

In Grade 5, the same child was asked to list simple household tools. The list includes "nif, frk, spon," "pansl," "talafon," "Ion more" and "ti catl."

That's knife, fork, spoon, pencil, telephone, lawnmower and tea kettle.

BIG CROWD: Cumming - and more than 200 others concerned with language education in London schools - crowded into the London board of education chambers Tuesday night to make presentations on "whole language," the approved teaching method used in London schools since 1987.

Cumming was one of 29 presenters who gave either oral or written presentations to the board's program committee, which is responsible for overseeing how and what is taught in the city's public classrooms.

She said the child in question finally, made spelling progress as well as better neatness in his work after private tutoring.

"What happens when the language program doesn't present the results the system says it will?" asked Cumming. "A faulty education isn't something you can return for a refund. like a washing machine... this is our children's future."

Cumming said the teaching methods now used where teachers follow a child's own pace and teach by encouragement, rather than criticizing when a child doesn't reach high standards, backfire in the end. "if work a student presents is always acceptable, always presentable, no matter what it's like, that is all you will ever get."

Several trustees and education director Darryl Skidmore commented on the thoroughness and thoughtfulness of the presentations, which contained references covering everything from 18th century French philosopher Jean Jacques Rousseau to bibliography lists of modern-day education specialists.

Skidmore said he plans to release a directive to the board today giving "quality assurance a higher profile and commitment throughout this system ... The London board of education must be willing to put its reputation on the line." While he didn't discuss specifics of his directive, he said the reforms "deal with accountability head-on" and will cover everything from what's taught in the classroom to staff assessment.

OTHER COMMENTS

  • Mark Flear, London teacher and parent: "Whole language is not a magical, mystical method descended from ivory towers. It's common sense." He said expectations for learning reading and writing are skewed: "We expect it will take a child five years to team enough spoken language to hold a conversation with an adult, but we expect them to cover three times the amount of work (to learn reading and writing) in one-third the time, once they start school."

  • Robert Metz, Freedom Party of Ontario: His party, which published a flyer critical of whole language in March and presented a 10-page booklet on the issue Tuesday night, advocates parental choice in education, with parents choosing where to direct their tax dollar. He suggested the board offer phonics-based language instruction in some schools and let parents decide which kind of education they want for their child.

    ASTOUNDED: "I have been astounded by the degree of hostility directed toward me from whole language supporters," he said, producing as an example a letter from a London school principal that labels the anti-whole-language flyer "hate literature."

    "We want you to teach the sound of letters to school children. How can this be construed as hate literature?"


    WHOLE LANGUAGE

    Sometimes called whole-to-part approach to teaching language. When children learn to speak, they hear adults speaking fluently and catch on by first recognizing words, then learning to speak them. They learn how to put words together correctly through trial and error. Whole language leaches reading and writing skills in the same way: Children are immersed in written words, through story hours and shared reading, and then encouraged to express themselves as best they can, with correct use learned over time. Its supporters say spelling, grammar and phonics (sounding out words) are part of this process; its detractors say some children learn expressiveness, but not the basic building blocks of language, and end up unable to write or read well.




    Contact FP
    Freedom Flyer Newsletter

    e-mail

    Page last updated on April 28, 2002

    FP logo (small)